My Photo

Your email address:

Powered by FeedBlitz

Find Alexandra

« Book Review: The 29% Solution | Main | 5 Ways to Be Productive Between Christmas and New Years »

December 21, 2008


Good points for both sides of the argument. I tend to lean towards taking the package if they are offering it because you never know if cutbacks may hit you.

I'm in agreement with the previous comment. There is also some reputable research that suggests that the first offer is normally the best offer. That doesn't mean that you can't negotiate that offer, but that if you turn down the opportunity, the next time an offer comes up it won't be as lucrative. Obviously, this research is generally true--or far more often true, than not--and your opportunity may be different. But I think most employees need to be aware that in general this is the case.

Second, there are legal counselors who will help you negotiate better. They will coach you in their office, and will not come and represent you. As a rule, you will do better negotiating for yourself, not setting up an adversarial or legal situation. But I have a significant number of clients who have done exceptionally well for themselves by taking the coaching training. For those of you who have interest, contact me through my website and I'll give you one name of a lawyer involved in the business--(I'm not on his payroll.).

@Mark, true. After all, if you're cut-able now, that situation might not change in a few months.

@Dan, thanks again for your great insights on the blog, and I appreciate you explaining the nuances of bringing in legal counsel.

Ok, I have a question that seems to have many interpretations. 10 people were layed off at the company we worked. They are definitely going down sooner or later. They offered a 1 week pay for severence but sent a very legalize document which I interpreted to have a clause relieving them of their obligations for any health and welfare benefits. They do not indicate Cobra, but since I believe the company will fold and merge with another company, I worried that that clause would exclude me from continuing my Cobra benefits if they should merge. I sent it to an employee specialist lawyer and she seemed to interpret that clause as I did. My question is,..Is that legal? Can they have you waive rights under the Federal Cobra law? I know that if they should fold and offer no health plan, they there is no Cobra, but if they file chapter 11 the company taking over may have to include you in their plan. I just wanted to know if I am correct to reject the offer of one week's pay as the clause made me nervous as it did the attorney. Can a company do that is my question. Doesn't Federal statutes override that. They did not specifically say you waive your Cobra rights but it did say health and welfare benefits would be barred if you agree.

Any information would be very helpful.


What about when a company is just offering a voluntary separation package only to those 55 or older who have 5 or more years with the company? It comes with a deadline for submission. Isn't that discrimanatory to state an age of employees for consideration of a VSP?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Visit our sponsor, DeVryWORKS, for more essential information on skills gap training.