I love this post from Michael McKinney at Leading Blog. It’s based on a new book from Alvin
Felzenberg, The Leaders We Deserved (and a Few We Didn't):
Rethinking the Presidential Rating Game. Felzenberg devised six criteria to best
describe various U.S.
presidents’ contribution to history.
Based on this exercise, he presents a list of what we should look for in
presidential candidates.
Adversity.
All of the great and near great presidents emerged from conflicts and
disappointments they encountered stronger and more resilient ten they had
before. This is what made their previous ordeals transformative. All regarded
these adversities as learning experiences, however painful. None emerged from
such setbacks regarding themselves as victims. None were known to complain or
whine—at least out loud or in public—about their private misfortunes.
Broad Life Experiences. Most great
and near great presidents had multiple occupations, not all of them in
politics, before coming president. Through the depth and breadth of their
experiences, successful presidents learned how to relate to people in all walks
of life.
Natural Curiosity. Great of near
great presidents remained curious all their lives about the world around them
and about the cause of the problems they were called upon to solve.
Well-Developed Sense of Integrity.
Look for honesty (doing what one said he would do, or explaining why unforeseen
circumstances necessitated a different course), courage (meeting adversity
head-on, often at political or personal risk), and integrity (placing the
interests of one’s office and one’s country ahead of personal convenience or
interests, or those of one’s associates).
Humility. Although confident in
their abilities, successful presidents held their egos in check. All great and
near great presidents understood that they would receive the credit for the
achievements of their subordinates. For this reason they strove to find
outstanding ones…including on occasion, former rivals and members of the
opposition party.