« 7 Tips for Negotiating a Better Severance Package | Main | The Right Way to Think About Succession »

June 25, 2009

Comments

Great topic. I just think that some of the suggested responses are a bit arbitrary/expected. Recruiters know that everyone has faults and flaws. To me, pretending you don't have any flaws or sidestepping every question that goes in this direction would make you come across as if you're just telling the recruiter what they want to hear and that you're not being sincere. If I was interviewing someone, these sorts of answers would not reassure me about their ability or their suitability for the position.

But great post, thanks for sharing!

@Rui: A valid contrarian viewpoint, and I agree to a certain extent. I think that you certainly have to be careful about appearing too perfect, and thus insincere.

The 'weakness' answer I've found works best is stating that weaknesses and strengths vary greatly depending on the situation at hand. For instance, one could say perfectionism is a weakness or flaw but when it comes to situations where being detail-oriented is a plus, then perfectionism becomes a strength.

The same happens with other weaknesses/strengths. Just to give another example impatience could be a plus when facing tight or strict deadlines. It really does depend on the situation.

And after you've made your point, simply say that you've managed to learn from past experiences to use this balance between weakenesses and strengths to the company's favor and you would undoubtedly do the same if hired for the position.

Alexandra: Really great stuff that interviewees need. Eventually, though the smart interviewee can turn the conversation to asking questions of the recruiter--that show the interviewee's smarts. Telling an interviewer you're smart doesn't work well, but asking smart questions knocks 'em dead

@DIT: Personally, this was how I always approached the weakness question.

@Dan E: In fiction we call this "show, don't tell." Guess it works for interviews too.

Great blog! I have to disagree on a few of the points the writer made, though.

#1 I say you must be prepared with a weakness, but have the ability to turn it into a positive or a learning challenge. Perhaps give an example.

#3 I agree, however I think the writer failed to mention that you MUST be prepared and demonstrate you know things about the company.

#2 and #7 So agree!

Great info, thanks!

@Paige: Great comments. I too wondered if some interviewers would roll their eyes if you didn't name any weaknesses.

To me, this sounds like a joke. As a hiring manager, if someone gave me these answers I would think that they are insincere and/or are hiding stuff. Honesty and integrity are important. I'm not going to hire someone whom I feel doesn't know him or herself well enough to answer these questions honestly. No one is perfect. It's best for both sides to acknowledge this and work with it.

@Alexis: Thanks for the perspective from a hiring manager. If a candidate gave you the weakness answer suggested here, would you press them on it?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)